cust.co / Companies / GitLab (GTLB)

GitLab NRR

Net Revenue Retention history for GitLab (GTLB) - Dev Tools, Public stage. Sourced from SEC filings and earnings releases.

Latest NRR · FY2027-Q2
117%
All-time peak
130%
FY2021-Q3
All-time low
117%
FY2027-Q1
Disclosures tracked
18
since FY2021-Q3
QoQ flat
YoY ▼ 2pp
3-year ▼ 13pp

NRR vs GRR over time

80%90%100%110%120%130%140% 100% FY21-Q3FY23FY25-Q1FY25-Q4FY26-Q3FY27-Q2 Retention NRR (incl. expansion) GRR (excl. expansion) NRR - FY2021-Q3: 130% NRR - FY-2022: 130% NRR - FY2023-Q1: 130% NRR - FY-2023: 130% NRR - FY2024-Q1: 130% NRR - FY-2024: 130% NRR - FY2025-Q1: 129% NRR - FY2025-Q2: 126% NRR - FY2025-Q3: 124% NRR - FY2025-Q4: 118% NRR - FY2026-Q1: 122% NRR - FY2026-Q2: 121% NRR - FY2026-Q3: 119% NRR - FY2026-Q4: 118% NRR - FY2027-Q1: 117% NRR - FY2027-Q2: 117% GRR - FY2027-Q1: 90% GRR - FY2027-Q2: 90%
FY2021-Q3 → FY2027-Q2

Gross Retention excludes expansion - it shows pure churn / contraction loss. The gap between NRR and GRR is the expansion lift.

Peak NRR of 130% in FY2021-Q3. Latest is 117% - that's -13pp from peak.

GitLab is above the Dev Tools Public median by +9.5pp (cell median: 108%)

What the data shows

GitLab (GTLB) is a dev tools company at the public stage. As of its most recent disclosure (FY2027-Q2), GitLab reported a Net Revenue Retention rate of 117% - a strong result for B2B SaaS at this segment.

GitLab's NRR peaked at 130% in FY2021-Q3, 13pp above today's level. Over the past three years, the metric has contracted by 13pp.

Within its peer set (dev tools companies at public stage in the $25k-$100k acv band), GitLab's NRR is above the cell median of 108%. Compare against the full peer cell aggregate for distribution and top performers.

Customer mix

Total customers
11,114
2026-07-31
Over $100K ARR
1,571
2026-07-31
Over $1M ARR
-
US revenue mix
84%
2026-07-31
Top-10 concentration
-
Average ACV
-

Commercial structure

Contract shape and forward-booked revenue.

Multi-year contracts
-
Avg contract length
-
RPO (total)
$1.2B
2026-07-31
cRPO (next 12mo)
$754M
2026-07-31
New customers added
1,700
2026-07-31
Subscription rev mix
90%
2026-07-31

Customer flow

Logo flow per period (count-side complement to dollar-based NRR).

New customers added
1,700
2026-07-31
Lost customers
-

Scale & headcount

Revenue, ARR, and team-size denominators for the productivity ratios.

Revenue (period)
$286M
2026-07-31
Total ARR
-
ARR growth (YoY)
42%
2026-07-31
AE headcount
-
Total employees
-

RPO duration breakdown

Forward-booked revenue by maturity. Renewal pipeline visibility.

Next 12 months
$754M
2026-07-31
13–24 months
-
Over 24 months
-
Total RPO
$1.2B
2026-07-31

The post-sales motion

Pricing model
hybrid
Renewal cadence
annual
CS team size
-
Customers per CSM
-

Support tiers: Standard · Premium · Ultimate

CS team segments: Enterprise · Mid-Market · SMB

Education programs: GitLab Training

Customer Advisory Board: Yes

Derived signals

Computed from the data above. Shows where value comes from and where leakage hides.

Expansion contribution
27pp
NRR − GRR
GRR drag
10%
churn + contraction

What GitLab is doing

Named CS initiatives across recent disclosures (newest first).

What they're working through

Challenges acknowledged by management. Useful peer signals - your team is probably not alone.

What execs say about post-sales

Curated quotes about customer outcomes, retention, renewals.

"Q1 DBNRR was driven by a combination of seat expansion at approximately 80%, increased customer yield at approximately 5%, and tier upgrades at approximately 15%."
Brian Robbins, CFO (Prepared Remarks)
"This is all complemented by enhanced customer success and post sales playbook designed to accelerate customer value realization and platform adoption."
Bill Staples, CEO & Director (Prepared Remarks)
"Our customer retention metrics continue to reflect the strength and durability of our platform value proposition. We maintain consistently strong net dollar retention rates across our customer cohorts."
Brian Robins, CFO (Prepared Remarks)
"Q3 was similar to Q2, where seats contributed slightly over 80% of the mix. Yield was about 10% and the remaining from up tiering."
James Shen, Interim CFO (Q&A)
"as these customers are coming up for renewal, there is a lot of scrutiny and auditing around licensed usage."
James Shen, Interim CFO (Q&A)
"We believe better utilization should strengthen our already healthy retention profile by reducing the potential for churn and contraction driven by unused spend."
Bill Staples, CEO (Prepared Remarks)

Competitive dynamics

Compare GitLab to peers

Side-by-side NRR, customer cohorts, commercial structure, and CS motion.

Featured in these rankings

GitLab appears on 3 of our retention leaderboards.

Embed this chart

Free to embed on your blog or board deck. Includes a small backlink to cust.co.

<iframe src="https://cust.co/companies/gitlab/embed/" width="600" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Or grab the data: JSON API →

Every disclosure

Period NRR GRR Source type Filing
FY2027-Q2 117% 90% 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2027-Q1 117% 90% earnings-call-transcript source ↗
FY-2026 118% - 10-K source ↗
FY2026-Q4 118% - 10-K source ↗
FY2026-Q3 119% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2026-Q2 121% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2026-Q1 122% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q4 118% - def-14a source ↗
FY-2025 123% - 10-K source ↗
FY2025-Q3 124% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q2 126% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY2025-Q1 129% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY-2024 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2024-Q1 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY-2023 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2023-Q1 130% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
FY-2022 130% - 10-K source ↗
FY2021-Q3 130% - 10-Q-mdna source ↗
Last verified disclosure: 2026-07-31 · Report an inaccuracy → · How we verify →

How does your NRR compare to GitLab's?

Generate a live retention report against GitLab and your full peer cell. Ungated. Downloadable as PDF.